Introduction The main purpose of this page is to publish my concerns with Goleman and his writing on emotional intelligence. For example, I want to let people know about the differences between his claims and those of the academic theorists and researchers.
Get paper and start drawing?
There are two very different ways to approach the design process, both of which work, but for different types of designers: The "Implicit" approach known as the "Atelier", or "Black Box" method: Design is a holistic and creative process, and unlike engineering work, is inhibited by the application of too much logic.
As an implicit and graphic process, design is best learned by watching. It suggests the design process is best taught through implication. The right design is achieved through recognition based on intuition rather than invention based on issues analysis. The "Explicit" approach known as the "Inquiry" method: Design is only valid so far as it addresses the problems underlying the process.
If necessary, he can gather additional information about the problem. In considering the problem, the designer should know and be able to concisely express to others three things about the project: Although solutions may be found through intuitive insight, the level of understanding on which they are based must grow from careful analysis.
No architect or architecture student can develop a truly convincing and substantive design without a well-considered approach. For some, it is easier to incorporate all the relevant factors through an Explicit approach.
For them, starting right-in on design sketches before thinking about the project is likely to yield disappointing results. Until the customer is understood, any work done on the clothing is wasted.
It is therefore necessary to find an approach for understanding the architectural equivalent of the tailor. If a designer can achieve the required depth of understanding through an intuitive grasp of the situation, the Implicit approach will work well. Otherwise, a more analytic methodology may be called for.
One way to understand design problems in a focused manner is discussed herein. By itself, every design problem has numerous possible solutions.
When combined with a specific designer, however, a project has only one best solution. This occurs when the designer knows himself well his values and design priorities, which are different for each unique designerand the design problem is perfectly described and understood.
When a project is described in only the broadest, most general terms, the borders are too loose to mold the form of the project that will be produced. Goals are defined by describing borders, fences or criteria, that limit the possible solutions to only those which answer the significant problems.
Unfortunately, irrelevant borders will just as effectively fence out alternatives as relevant criteria.
It is therefore vital to fine-tune the selection of borders. One approach to this describes borders in terms of a Premise and Concept. The Premise describes what the client or in architecture schools, the design studio criticthe users and the site want the project to be.
It is developed from conversations or other fact-gathering techniques with the client or teacher and users, often in response to questions posed by the designer. Additionally, data is gathered about the site. The second part of the process, the Concept, describes the approach, philosophy or attitude which the designer wants to pursue in developing the Premise into a Design.
It might be best to further break down the Concept into Program and Design Concepts. To describe them concisely:Complexity characterises the behaviour of a system or model whose components interact in multiple ways and follow local rules, meaning there is no reasonable higher instruction to define the various possible interactions..
The term is generally used to characterize something with many parts where those parts interact with each other in multiple ways, . Critical Review: Mike Austin's Swing Methodology. Click here to go back to the index page..
Introduction: In this review paper, I will be discussing Mike Austin. Advances in Consumer Research Volume 2, Pages PERCEIVED RISK AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: A CRITICAL REVIEW. Ivan Ross, University of Minnesota. The empirical research relating perceived risk to consumer behavior is summarized.
The field of digital image processing has experienced continuous and significant expansion in recent years. The usefulness of this technology is apparent in many different disciplines covering entertainment through remote sensing. Table 2: Evaluating Additional Roles with Clients.
Table 2 is designed to help assess whether blending roles should even be considered. We adapt from the ideas of many others as well as our own observations and research.
Critical Review: Mike Austin's Swing Methodology. Click here to go back to the index page.. Introduction: In this review paper, I will be discussing Mike Austin's swing methodology.